Skip to content

Video companion

After Michele Mosca: Mosca inequality for your board

Michele Mosca co-founded the Institute for Quantum Computing and evolutionQ. His public lectures frame the quantum threat as a call to modernize how organizations manage cryptography.

Mosca inequality X plus Y versus Z gauge.
Michele Mosca Public Lecture: As We Enter a New Quantum Era Watch on YouTube

What the video gets right

Mosca emphasizes that preparing for quantum computers makes infrastructure more agile — not just quantum-safe, but able to swap algorithms when any crypto threat emerges. The threat to RSA and ECC is real; the fix is a decade-plus process already underway through NIST PQC standardization.

His X + Y > Z framework (detailed in the Global Risk Institute report) turns HNDL into a planning formula:

  • X = years data must stay confidential
  • Y = years to migrate
  • Z = years until a CRQC breaks your algorithms

When X + Y exceeds Z, you have exposure now. See also PostQuantum.com on HNDL.

What it does not cover

Boards need quantified exposure per data class, not just the inequality. Inventory must tag which assets protect long-shelf-life records.

This quarter

  1. Run Mosca inputs on the interactive calculator.
  2. Present X, Y, Z assumptions to your risk committee with explicit data retention policies.
  3. Start external TLS inventory with algorithm tags and re-scan cadence.

Continue on the Q-Day hub: Mosca inequality guide

References & further reading

Authoritative primary sources cited in this article. Summaries are our own — follow links for full context.

Last verified 2026-06-21

See your exposure with evidence

Run a live PQC inventory scan, export a CBOM, and verify signed reports independently.